A moral crisis grips the US border. Yet the religious right is shamefully silent | Marilynne Robinson | Opinion | The Guardian

As a matter of recent policy, agents of the American government take children from their parents’ arms at our southern border. They are kept at separate facilities for indeterminate periods of time. The parents are jailed and the children are put in the care of non-governmental agencies, sometimes in other states. It is hard to imagine that the higher rate of incarceration and the new system of calculated injury to children would not soon overwhelm existing arrangements no matter how many shelters and beds are provided for a frightened, heartbroken population of the very young, whose miseries are intended as a disincentive to future potential border-crossers.

Source: A moral crisis grips the US border. Yet the religious right is shamefully silent | Marilynne Robinson | Opinion | The Guardian

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Martin Niemoller

The US is violating the Human Rights of Children – and the UN is calling us out on it.

That is a title to a post that I never thought I would have to write.

It’s something I never wanted to write – because I didn’t want it be true.

But here’s the reality:

  • Previously, the US Customs and Border patrols would, I’ve been told, keep children with their parents when they arrive at the border unless they had significant reason to believe they were not with relatives and were at risk of being trafficked.  In that case, the child would be placed in a foster care situation while the situation was resolved or other family was located.   I don’t have the statistics but from what I understand the number was minimal.
  • The current administration, specifically Attorney General Jeff Sessions, acting under direction of the President, changed that policy.   That policy is now a zero tolerance policy.   What does that mean?   That means that if you show up at the border and want to come in to the United States, our government will take your children.  We will put you in prison in one prison and we will put your child somewhere else and we won’t tell you where.   And the place where we put your child will probably not be a nice place, probably not be adequately staffed and will definitely be highly traumatic to your child(ren).   
  • Oh and it doesn’t matter whether you are here seeking asylum or here without the proper documentation, the current administration is doing that for and to everyone.  At least everyone who is coming in through Mexico gets treated that way.

Let me make sure I’m perfectly clear – we are a country that has put economic sanctions in place against other countries because of human rights violations in those countries.   And now the UN is saying that we’re violating human rights also.

Here’s part of what the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights had to say about us:

We are deeply concerned that the zero tolerance policy recently put in place along the US southern border has led to people caught entering the country irregularly being subjected to criminal prosecution and having their children – including extremely young children -taken away from them as a result.

The practice of separating families amounts to arbitrary and unlawful interference in family life, and is a serious violation of the rights of the child. While the rights of children are generally held in high regard in the US, it is the only country in the world not to have ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. We encourage it to accede to the Convention and to fully respect the rights of all children.

The use of immigration detention and family separation as a deterrent runs counter to human rights standards and principles. The child’s best interest should always come first, including over migration management objectives or other administrative concerns. It is therefore of great concern that in the US migration control appears to have been prioritised over the effective care and protection of migrant children.

Children should never be detained for reasons related to their own or their parents’ migration status. Detention is never in the best interests of the child and always constitutes a child rights violation.

Read the entire briefing from Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23174&LangID=E

I would really like to think that all except for the most hardened and heartless racists would see that those who come to the border, whether they come seeking asylum or whether they come hoping to enter without documentation are coming because they have lost all hope of a decent life for them and their children in their birth country.   And that those who are coming deserve to be treated with human dignity and the human rights that every human deserves.

Apparently I am wrong.   Because if this move was truly unpopular with their “fan base” then the current administration would not be doing it.

That is truly disappointing.

I will have more thoughts and suggestions on how to let your opinion be known, hopefully later this afternoon.

Stay tuned

Tom

Columbine and a Moral Compass?

I know I’m aging myself when I say this, but how many of you can remember where you were when you heard the news about the shooting at Columbine’s high school?   I can.  I can tell you which gas station I was pulling into when it came on the radio. While it wasn’t the first shooting, it was, in many ways, the most widely discussed, widely seen and closely scrutinized.  

But not the only one.  

And last week, there was another one.  For me, this one hit a little closer to home because a friend of mine knows one of the students who was killed.

There are so many screaming voices out there in the social media world right now.   

Some of them are screaming, “take away the guns!”   Others are screaming, “don’t touch my guns!   I need my semi-automatic sub machine gun!”

Some are saying, “Isn’t this awful, we’ll keep them in our thoughts and prayers…..” and then moving on with their own life.   Others are saying the “thoughts and prayers” comments in front of a camera to make themselves appear to look better.

Some are saying, “He must have been mentally ill, our system failed him and them.”    Others are saying, “Then why is the government slashing mental health budgets and why are we standing by quietly while they slash the funding to take care of those with mental illnesses?”

Some are saying, “the shooter was white and was arrested unharmed – would that have been different if he was black?  or Hispanic?”   Good question

Some are saying, “It’s the video games.   They are too violent.”   And then they go to movies that glorify violence.

I read an article over the weekend that I believe reframes the context.   It offers an explanation of what is happening and why it is happening.

But it doesn’t offer a “how do we fix it” to the problem.   Read my comments below:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/why-do-mass-shootings-happen-best-explanation/

Writing in 2015, Malcolm Gladwell wrote what I think is still the best explanation for modern American mass shootings, and it’s easily the least comforting. At the risk of oversimplifying a complex argument, essentially he argues that each mass shooting lowers the threshold for the next. He argues, we are in the midst of a slow-motion “riot” of mass shootings, with the Columbine shooting in many ways the key triggering event.

A “slow motion riot of mass shootings.”

They are all connected?   And everyone since the Columbine shooters is looking back and saying, “If he did, I can?”   “If he did, I can do better? or louder? or with more force?”

Let’s apply the Vanderwell Rule of 50%.  Actually, let’s turn it into the Vanderwell Rule of 33%.   Let’s say, for discussion sake, that there are three main reasons why these school shootings are happening:

  • Guns – there are too many guns that are designed for maximum destruction that are accessible to people who shouldn’t have them.   Not that there are too many guns or that all guns are bad, but just that there are too many guns of maximum destructive power that are available.
  • Exposure to violence – there’s too many examples in the media, in video games, in movies where violence not only happens very frequently but the message that comes with the violence is that violence is the answer to your problem.   If you don’t like it, shoot someone.

Oh and both of those reasons and their proponents fail miserably at supporting the mental health profession to make sure there are adequate resources to deal with and support those with mental health illnesses and those who are trying to get them help.

  • The last reason of our three reasons is what the article explained – it’s a slow motion riot.   Every school shooting makes it more likely that another one will happen.   Every school shooting makes it more likely that the next one will try to be bigger.   Every school shooting creates trauma that will impact and harm the survivors for the rest of their lives.

All three of those reasons have one thing in common.   They are all impacted by the fact that we have, as a nation, as a society, as communities, lost our moral compass:

  • We’ve lost our moral compass because we think it’s okay for semi automatic weapons of mass destruction to be available for way too many people.
  • We’ve lost our moral compass because we glorify violence – not violence that happens as part of the military – but violence that happens when people decide that shooting is the answer to their anger.
  • We’ve lost our moral compass because every time another school shooting happens, nothing changes.  And that makes the next one more likely.

We’ve lost our moral compass. 

We don’t need a new one, we need to find the one that we’ve used for a very long time.   Pick it up, dust it off and start using it again.  How do we do that?

Gun laws – many of my “pro gun” friends argue that we don’t need new laws because the existing laws are adequate to keep those kind of guns out of the hands of those who can’t handle them.   If so, then push our government to enforce the laws.   Get to know your local, county, state and federal representatives and urge them to support enforcement of good gun laws – ones that keep guns in the right hands and out of the unsafe ones.

Glorifying violence – how do you combat that?  Vote with your wallet.   Don’t let the industry have record breaking success with the movies and shows and games that promote senseless violence.   Speak out by supporting the industry people who don’t promote those type of violent behaviors

Mental illness – we’ve lost our moral compass because for too many people and for too long, we’ve refused to be willing to acknowledge mental illness the same way we do physical disabilities.   Look at the funding and budget slashing going on in the mental health field.   Look at how difficult insurance companies make it to get good quality mental health care.   Once again, we have lost our moral compass and we need to change that, support the mentally ill and provide the resources to those trying to get them help.

Slow Motion Riot – if every one of these school shootings is another step in a slow motion riot, then we’ve lost our moral compass because our children are growing up either afraid that their classmates will shoot them or thinking that it’s okay to shoot someone they are mad at   How do we address that?

  • The church needs to do a better job, a much better job, at making the Bible and Jesus relevant in the lives of the younger generations.   I wrote, this morning, about the youth director at our church.   The church needs more people to be leaders and relevant to the youth of today.
  • The schools need to do a better job at promoting decency, politeness and respect.   Now before you get all up and upset with me, I’m not saying that will stop school shootings – but it will certainly make schools a nicer place to be and a safer place to be.
  • The families – and those who support and can support families – need to work towards an environment of love, respect and authority so that kids will feel safe, will feel like they matter and will feel like they have a future.

Whew, if you made it this far, thank you.   None of these are the complete answer, but all of them together could make a big difference.

Now the question is, are we going to do anything?

Tom

Haiti, TPS, 50% and What It Is

The following statements have been made about the current administration and Temporary Protected Status for approximately 59,000 Haitians who have been living and working in the United States. Most of them (I don’t know the exact number) came after the earthquake in Haiti in January of 2010.

Temporary Protected Status is a program that allows people to come into the United States when it has been declared that their country is unsafe due to political violence, genocide, natural disasters, war and ……….

A link to the stories that have these statements in them is at the bottom of this……

USCIS staff wrote a memo in October of 2017 that said that the conditions, the reasons for granting TPS for Haitians in the first place, have not improved.

Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week called for an investigation after they uncovered diplomatic cables that showed “officials at the U.S. Embassies in El Salvador, Haiti, and Honduras all stated that it would be in the ‘U.S. national interest’ to renew the TPS designations for their respective countries.”

“Haiti has made significant progress in recovering from the 2010 earthquake, and no longer continues to meet the conditions for designation,” wrote USCIS Director Francis Cissna in a Nov. 3 memo for Department of Homeland Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.


But in an October 17 memo, Cissna’s staff at USCIS directly contradicted this rosy picture. “Many of the conditions prompting the original January 2010 TPS designation persist,” the memo noted. (Both memos are embedded at the bottom of this post.)

In a memo distributed to staff Thursday afternoon, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services—the agency tasked with processing citizenship for applicants—announced it has scrubbed a passage of its mission statement of references to the U.S. being a nation of immigrants. Oooo-kay.


Tom here – so we are no longer a nation of immigrants? And it was the son of immigrants from Peru who made that change?

So let’s take a look at all of these statements. They all appear to be from reputable sources. Many of them name names and have links or even copies of documents embedded in them.

But I’ve never heard of splinternews.com before. Have you?

So, let’s apply the Vanderwell rule of 50% to what they have said in these three articles.

Remember what that is?

Let’s assume that half of what these articles say are made up, false, exaggerated or something of that sort.

If they are……

If they are, does what they are saying still ring true?

Here’s the way I see it. People in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Department did some of the following:
• Exaggerated the improvement of the conditions in Haiti.
• Attempted to find information that could make the Haitians here on TPS look bad.
• Ignored statements by their own staff that contained a much more realistic view of the conditions in Haiti.
• Ignored statements by State Department people in Haiti and elsewhere that sending these people back would be deterimental to US national security.

Stop and read those last 5 words.

Deterimental (that means bad).

To US National Security – that means dangerous for us if we send them back.

But they ignored those statements.

What else did they do? They continued to work for the US administration after the President referred to Haiti as a #$%$$tHole and said that all Haitians probably have AIDS.

If half of this is true, we have a current administration running the government that, well, I don’t think there’s any other conclusion for it.

They want to get as many people of color out of the United States as they can.

(If you have another conclusion to why these actions are happening, feel free to lay out your theory in the comments below.)

And they will falsify, ignore and attempt to malign people to make that goal happen.

Remember – the 50% rule – and we still have a disturbingly convincing case that the decision to end Temporary Protected Status was not done because Haiti is now a great place to live. Instead it was done for more sinister and uncomfortable reasons.

And as I have friends who live there, I’ve worked for organizations there, and know many Haitians, this makes me sad and angry at the same time.

Tom

The articles in question……

https://splinternews.com/immigration-agency-removes-clause-referring-to-the-u-s-1823250677

https://splinternews.com/dhs-ignored-its-own-staffs-findings-before-ending-human-1825323760

https://splinternews.com/dhs-officials-sought-negative-information-on-haitians-b-1826051056/amp